Skip to main content

About your Search

20130313
20130321
STATION
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
FOX News
Mar 19, 2013 7:00pm PDT
because of the way the law is written. so there is talk providing that in military areas, but in areas like this it's hard to see unless there's a ground swell for a short-term solution to he restore the money. >> greta: and i thought the republicans offered the flexibility to the white house and white house declined it. >> they offered it on the defense side and it may happen. they said they want it as part of a broader package over the sequester, but we're getting to the point look, the sequester is the law, it's happened, the cuts are implemented. i think there's going to be more pressure to say, wait a second, back this up and find it in the civilian area and find something that shouldn't be cut and we cut it. >> greta: or find $137,000 whatever the number is, in waste in the department of education and they won't. thank you. >> thank you. >> greta: on capitol hill, a debate the homeland security department released 2000 illegal detainees, including felons. and taking on ice director john morton. >> it appears to me that the release of detainees was part of the sequester campaign t
FOX News
Mar 12, 2013 7:00pm PDT
its own budget. the law says that the president must submit a budget by the first part of february. and kelly ayotte. >> good to be with you. >> greta: and you're not responsible for the president, but are you curious? >> i'm very curious where it is. you think about it, i'm glad the senate democrats are finally going to do a budget in the senate, but basically he's rendered himself irrelevant because his budget is apparently going to come after the house puts forth its budget, after the senate does its budget, and so, where is he on this issue? you'd think he would have a fiscal blueprint for the country. >> greta: now what i don't get? you're a lawyer, i'm a lawyer and maybe i'm too literal about it he's obligated to do it i think by the first monday in february. presidents before him have also failed and not the first time the president-- and he's failed a number of times. and when all of these presidents, the reason why we have the rules, we have some semblance of order. he said now the end of march and now we hear into april. what's the point of these rules and these laws? >>
FOX News
Mar 18, 2013 7:00pm PDT
from everything to mechanics to campaign finance laws. >> greta: one of the questions, the perception according to you, is that the republican party-- >> according to polling. >> greta: a party of rich-- yeah, polling. party of rich, narrow, stuffy, out of touch people and you want to reach the minority, female and young. >> greta: how do you convince you have anything for them if you're part of the rich, stuffy-- >> and obviously that's perception. part of is if you're not showing up in the community, the perception and narrative becomes reality. when we announced yesterday and today is that the national party -- in 2013, mind you, after a presidential election, that's never been done, is just going to spend just on the political oranges itself 10 million dollars which will include hundreds, a few people down the hallway, but hundreds of people in communities across the country advocating for our party in asian, hispanic, african-american communities making their presence known, going to community events, swearing in ceremonies, everything. >> greta: one of the complaints i've had al
FOX News
Mar 13, 2013 7:00pm PDT
a republican form of government that we're not exempting ourselves from the operation of laws. so, it's a small money saver, but i think it speaks to a larger principle. >> and i guess under the constitution you can't do it. you have it wait. you can't adjust your salaries, congressional salaries until the next term, right? you can pass it now, but-- >> until the next election, this would take effect right after the next election and really, that the 27th amendment was put there to prevent pay increases, but we have to abide by the text of i don't want to lose support for the bill by raising the 27th amendment issue. >> what's sort of interesting, this is bipartisan, and you have a democrat on board with you. >> barra from california and i think it speaks to frustration that people have with congress. for example, we talked about the whole issue not doing a budget. required by law and haven't for four years and because we shamed them with the no budget, no pay, they've done a budget. so i think it's the idea na the american people, they have to avoid by rules fthey don't abide by rules there's
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)